|
Post by revwilma on Feb 16, 2011 15:27:07 GMT -5
Thank you for all the wonderful suggestions for coctails. I would appreciate suggestion or a coctails to use for individuals who have weight issues. This can encompass overweight as well as someone who is anerxic. Thank you
|
|
|
Post by larrysobel on Feb 18, 2011 19:04:00 GMT -5
Cocktails Within Cocktails
A friend’s father-in-law made the transition today, and I will run Susan’s “Deathcomfort_to_friends_and_family.src” cocktail today and on subsequent days. See Reply #69 in this thread:
I just noticed that this death comfort cocktail itself contains other cocktails. However, it cites only the names of these “subcocktails”, such as GMDEmotional 1, All Ultra Combinations, but it does not cite the specific corrections constituting each of the subcocktails. Apparently, identifying only the name of the subcocktail suffices because of one’s intention. Is that correct?
On the other hand, the comprehensive Fitness Trainer L1 cocktail [within the “Level 1 Trainer Cocktails” folder] contains the stand-alone fitness.src cocktail as a subcocktail, and lists all the corrections for the fitness.src cocktail. Strictly speaking, would it have been OK to only mention the name of the fitness.src cocktail, analogous to what Susan did for the death comfort cocktail?
Or, is merely citing the name of a subcocktail OK and still effective, but perhaps not exactly as effective as also including the specific corrections for the subcocktail?
Or, as Ray mentioned somewhere, perhaps it is not necessary to be as precise in running the src as my questions imply?
Getting back to the the Fitness Trainer L1 cocktail, I assume that this cocktail is intended for laypersons as well as Bruce Lee types ? Is that correct?
Larry
|
|
cindyd
ISR
Smooth Skating
Posts: 398
|
Post by cindyd on Feb 19, 2011 9:26:14 GMT -5
Deathcomfort_to_friends_and_family.src
I tried the search feature to find this download. . . . .didn't come up. Please advise.
thanks, a client's Aunt transitioned and the funeral is today.
|
|
|
Post by larrysobel on Feb 19, 2011 10:14:57 GMT -5
|
|
cindyd
ISR
Smooth Skating
Posts: 398
|
Post by cindyd on Feb 19, 2011 15:59:07 GMT -5
Thanks Larry, not sure how I missed them.
|
|
|
Post by larrysobel on Feb 19, 2011 16:53:54 GMT -5
My pleasure cindyd.
As I am sure you know, you have to be logged in while searching to find the downloadable attachment in .src or doc format. However, in the particular case of the “death” cocktail, there is a typo in the name of the cocktail attachment in reply #69, which uses Deathconfort instead of Deathcomfort, and this is probably why the search failed, assuming you were logged in. The downloaded cocktail has the correct spelling even though it’s name is miss-spelled in the post.
Got all that?
Larry
|
|
|
Post by Happy on Feb 20, 2011 23:35:14 GMT -5
I have a big Question... it seems as yet I have not read any testimonies regarding any specific Cocktail. Just wondered why no one who has created a cocktail is following up with testimonies as to how their particular cocktail has worked. Just a thought... I will say that my favorite one has been GMDEmotional1 cocktail. That one is a winner!! Thanks Grandmaster David. I do feel really centered and at peace after using it. Since most dis-ease is emotionally based I would say this one is a key to shifting a lot of stuff and things. I use this cocktail in almost every session I run on people. I would like to have some of you share what your cocktail has done and the change it has made for others or yourself. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by soxmason on Feb 21, 2011 0:41:58 GMT -5
Cocktails Within Cocktails A friend’s father-in-law made the transition today, and I will run Susan’s “Deathcomfort_to_friends_and_family.src” cocktail today and on subsequent days. See Reply #69 in this thread: I just noticed that this death comfort cocktail itself contains other cocktails. However, it cites only the names of these “subcocktails”, such as GMDEmotional 1, All Ultra Combinations, but it does not cite the specific corrections constituting each of the subcocktails. Apparently, identifying only the name of the subcocktail suffices because of one’s intention. Is that correct? On the other hand, the comprehensive Fitness Trainer L1 cocktail [within the “Level 1 Trainer Cocktails” folder] contains the stand-alone fitness.src cocktail as a subcocktail, and lists all the corrections for the fitness.src cocktail. Strictly speaking, would it have been OK to only mention the name of the fitness.src cocktail, analogous to what Susan did for the death comfort cocktail? Or, is merely citing the name of a subcocktail OK and still effective, but perhaps not exactly as effective as also including the specific corrections for the subcocktail? Or, as Ray mentioned somewhere, perhaps it is not necessary to be as precise in running the src as my questions imply? Getting back to the the Fitness Trainer L1 cocktail, I assume that this cocktail is intended for laypersons as well as Bruce Lee types ? Is that correct?
Larry
Hi Larry - When I first ran the "Deathcomfort..." cocktail, I ran it for 12 hours and found it had to be run for several more shorter sessions. I ran it for three days, then skipped two days and ran again. It then required a few more shorter sessions. When I create a cocktail I sometimes just put in "All SSTT PP" (PP for Pathogen Pack, etc.). Sometimes I will add a caveat at the end, Ex: "All SSTT PP for all issues concerning Sharon". Sometimes I will just load the full pack. It depends on how specific I want to be; How much stuff I have in a cocktail; How many cocktails I have combined into one cocktail. I have found it does not matter if you add the "line-by-line" cocktail, or the description of the cocktail with only enitials (as we do with "taiotp" or "tayfi"), or any combination of both. This means you will find I use any way to make a cocktail that tickles my fancy. Oh. And another thing... spelling doesn't matter (Yeah!), it's all intention! Getting back to your post, I think the answers are Yes; Yes; Yes; Yes; and Yes! ;D I will be posting more tomorrow on things that I have 'discovered' over the two weeks I have been out of town. Blessings! xo s
|
|
|
Post by David Harris on Feb 21, 2011 9:33:47 GMT -5
I have a big Question... it seems as yet I have not read any testimonies regarding any specific Cocktail. Just wondered why no one who has created a cocktail is following up with testimonies as to how their particular cocktail has worked. Just a thought... I will say that my favorite one has been GMDEmotional1 cocktail. That one is a winner!! Thanks Grandmaster David. I do feel really centered and at peace after using it. Since most dis-ease is emotionally based I would say this one is a key to shifting a lot of stuff and things. I use this cocktail in almost every session I run on people. I would like to have some of you share what your cocktail has done and the change it has made for others or yourself. Thanks More testimonies is always a good idea. Thanks for the kind words, and I am happy to hear you are doing well with it. God Bless.
|
|
|
Post by larrysobel on Feb 21, 2011 12:21:29 GMT -5
Thanks Susan for your usual thorough response, and for sharing your death_discomfort cocktail. It is appreciated that you and other forum members share your cocktails as gifts given lovingly and freely. As I have posted elsewhere, “the speed of the leader is the speed of the gang”. In doing a large and unknown group, such as those mourning the transition of a loved one, the subject of permission may come up. This subject is addressed in general in a thread started by Heiko Reske, and is worth reading. See: src4u.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=55&page=1#ixzz1Ec4MSM74 The following insightful reply by drd is excerpted from that thread, and it applies to large groups in general, and just those in mourning: ≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠ “I definitely do not work on anyone without their express permission. That being said, for a group like you are speaking of this is what I would do: Name your group like this......'This session is for XXX institutionalized children (or whatever it is called). If the children at xxx facility choose not to accept this healing session, or if it would be inappropriate in any way, then please send the energy to other beings that would like to receive it.' There are plenty of other ill souls that would gladly enjoy the energy of the session, and this way you put it into God's hands to send it where it would be most accepted. This can work for any institution. Consider St. Judes, hospitals, etc. That is the way I work with the issue D.” ≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠≠ Larry
|
|
cindyd
ISR
Smooth Skating
Posts: 398
|
Post by cindyd on Feb 21, 2011 12:22:40 GMT -5
I may have mentioned my experience of the lyme cocktail. . .WOW super potent. . . I had quite a detox reaction. . . . and received some suggestions on minimizing it. if you have lyme. . . USE IT and be sure you support your detox systems. . . . HOT water/foods REST. . . . detox baths. . . etc.
|
|
cindyd
ISR
Smooth Skating
Posts: 398
|
Post by cindyd on Feb 21, 2011 12:28:04 GMT -5
I am a big proponent of asking for permission before using any of our wonderful energy tools. . . but that is "just me".
I used the death/grieving cocktail on the family and friends during the funeral ( several of my clients are family) because they had asked me to "pray for them" so that is how I prayed !!!
Unless an individual asks me to do more. . . . that is all I did.
One client responded that she did notice a "shift" but wasn't sure if it was src4u or that the funeral was over. . .she thinks it was both. I'm "down with that" LOL
|
|
|
Post by soxmason on Feb 22, 2011 0:24:56 GMT -5
Hey, Larry - Thank you for posting the DRD excerpt. To add to this, I am usually in a 'special state' when I work. I'm open to whatever comes through, I'm talking to God, as well as to the client - whether I know that person or not (BTW.. I never work on clients in person and have not for years, which includes the SCIO). I am very aware of being open to the client's wishes and understand that what is not accepted by the client is welcomed elsewhere. And I think it's imperative to either note this deliberately 'with' the client on some level, or as an addition to the cocktail. On another note.... I just finished a new cocktail on brain health and dementia. I am very excited about it and am sharing it here. This cocktail contains a lot of nutrients, etc for general brain helath... and a plethora of more ingredients and processes for those experiencing some level of dementia and Alzheimer's. Note - if the client is already in the throws of this disease it will take longer to see result. But for a basic maintenance cocktail to keep your mind at it's peak this is great. I invite all to look it over, add what you want, delete what you want and let me know how it is working... and give me any feedback you have to offer. Thanks so much to all of us!! xo s PS - the next post will have the Word doc for this cocktail for those with Med, Lite and Ultra Lite software Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by soxmason on Feb 22, 2011 0:27:13 GMT -5
Dementia cocktail for Med, Lite and Ultra Lite SRC4U xo s Attachments:
|
|
cindyd
ISR
Smooth Skating
Posts: 398
|
Post by cindyd on Feb 22, 2011 14:53:20 GMT -5
WOW I love it when you send both forms. . . .so I can see what is in the cocktail. quite extensive, thanks for sharing
|
|