Questions about Mind set when doing Sessions

[angelamh]

I am wondering to all those that used the SCIO before SRC4U:

I know I am limiting my mind when using the SRC4U, is the idea with the SRC4U, that you place the concern, such as 'Parkinsons' and let the system figure out if it's a drug source, an agriculture toxin source, Lymes, etc? (of course, I am also adding 'nerves', 'muscle', 'glutathione', dopamine' 'detox' to the find button)

The reason I am asking, is I have clients now that are wanting answers to the core root of the problem. Like a new client who wants to know if they have a gluten allergy. I am thinking that first of all, I don't diagnose (try to stay away from anything that sounds like it) but if their concern is gluten, wouldn't I just place gluten, and allergy in the find box and the system will intuitively decide what is needed?

And to those that have used the SCIO, what do you tell your clients now, or when someone calls with a specific issue? Do you tell them you can place their concerns, and let the system figure out what is needed?

Blessings,
Angela

[soxmason]

Jan 24, 2011 17:03:47 GMT -5 angelamh said:

I am wondering to all those that used the SCIO before SRC4U:

I know I am limiting my mind when using the SRC4U, is the idea with the SRC4U, that you place the concern, such as 'Parkinsons' and let the system figure out if it's a drug source, an agriculture toxin source, Lymes, etc? (of course, I am also adding 'nerves', 'muscle', 'glutathione', dopamine' 'detox' to the find button)

The reason I am asking, is I have clients now that are wanting answers to the core root of the problem. Like a new client who wants to know if they have a gluten allergy. I am thinking that first of all, I don't diagnose (try to stay away from anything that sounds like it) but if their concern is gluten, wouldn't I just place gluten, and allergy in the find box and the system will intuitively decide what is needed?

And to those that have used the SCIO, what do you tell your clients now, or when someone calls with a specific issue? Do you tell them you can place their concerns, and let the system figure out what is needed?

Blessings,
Angela

WOW! What a great question! Let me see if I can add my thoughts on this clearly enough for you to understand how some of us think - tho' I have not taken any surveys on this subject! LOL

My first opinion is that you are not limiting your mind with this. If anything you are expanding your mind and the possibilities of using it in conjunction with the SRC, so much more so than with the SCIO. I have been using the SCIO for many years and at one time actually worked off 14 computers with the SCIO software -- all remotely, with wonderful results. Why? because I could work on 14 people at the same time and it would take me about 12 to 14 hours and then I would leave them on for another 8 hours. If I did the same thing with two computers it would take me days! When the SRC software came out I donated 12 of the computers to the local women's shelter because the SRC is so much more!

I still used my two computers with the SCIO software, but in virtual form with the CCP3 added - with 10 virtuals on one computer and 4 on another. Since the SRC has arrived I rarely use my SCIO -- here's why: I don't need it.

It sounds to me that you are using the SRC correctly in that the concern is Parkinson's, and then you add all the other stuff. In actuality you can just put in Parkinson's and ALL THAT STUFF and it would actually address that issue. However, when you add all the other item that you are you are actually sending those signals as you think of them and adding more signals to address the main issue.

Here's a *really* simple analogy: You're working on your sister because she's crying. You put in 'crying'. The SRC will connect to those signals, it will 'connect' to you and it will come up with a plan of action. However, if you add more pieces to the puzzle like, PMS, lost her dog, banged her thumb with a hammer, something triggered a deep seeded emotional issue - you are then presenting a better picture... a more precise picture for a more precise solution. And in the process the SRC will address all the other issues connected to this one. With the SCIO, you will get clues from your different programs within the SCIO, and then you go to another program to follow that lead, and another, and another. To do a really good job it will take time and perhaps several sessions. With the SRC, once you have created a cocktail you can, in a matter of a few minutes, address the issues and the SRC will alter the cocktail to address the issue that need to be addressed "in this moment in time".

When my clients ask what is the root --- I ask, what does it matter!? If the root is that you are gluten intolerant, the issue will be addressed - for a permanent solution... not a 'for now' solution that can then be triggered later in life. The SRC takes care of the triggers as well!

Because my medical background is limed to EMT and whatever else I have studied on my own, I always have my Internet available for research as I am designing a cocktail for someone. If they they tell me they have Parkinson's symptoms I look that up on Goggle (as well as several other medical sites I use - Western and alternative) and I come up with all sorts of information that I was not aware of that I can add to my cocktail. I am extremely satisfied with cocktails and feel extremely confident that the issues will be addresses. My confidence in the SRC is also a tool it uses. I also use my client's knowledge of his/her issues by asking questions which I have devised just by becoming familiar with the pull down menus in the SRC and all they offer.

I take my work very seriously. I learn a lot in the process and my clients benefit tremendously on all levels... as well, so do I.

Hope this was insightful. Take what you want and leave the rest.

Much love and Light... and Laughter!
xo
S

[5sevens]

A great question and a great answer, Susan. I love your analogy, simple but effective in getting the point across.
Susan responds when asked about the root cause...what does it matter? Tell your clients I'm not going to help you hold onto something that may not even be the issue; how about I just help you get your body balanced so that you can feel better.

Ray

[angelamh]

Thank you so much Susan and Ray~

I really appreciate both of you for taking the time to answer. It helped already so much! Thank you...

What I meant by limiting my mind, is actually my thought process felt closed because of how I've been working in the SCIO and that I wasn't 'open' to the truth or unlimited possibilities in the SRC4U, because I was trying to work it the same way. And even tho, my message missed clarity on what I meant, Susan, you answered it beautifully.

I love that we 'don't have to' go panel to panel searching/researching information...now I feel much more understanding of this at a new level. I was really struggling with not 'seeing' the stress patterns that would give me direction on where to go w/i the SCIO...now I see, I don't need to see them. And the confidence Susan you were talking about, just infused me too. I was just feeling like, I wasn't getting it...maybe because I wasn't working hard enough within the session!

Thank you also Ray for the insight about 'holding' onto something they no longer need.

I love this work. And I love that usually all it takes, is a different colored glass to see it in a much more expanded way!

Thank you! In Gratitude,
Angela

[mhall77]

Thank you for that great analogy Susan. It cleared up a lot of questions in my mind also. I too have been working with the Scio for the past several years and it is hard to break a pattern even when you know it is not necessary. It's like "the need to know" which is better if you don't know. Now we have the SRC and the game is "keep it simple". Aren't we fortunate to know David and Ray and to be the small percentage of the world to have this program. I guess you could call us the "chosen". Now we need to help pass this on.
Many Blessings, Marlene

[soxmason]

Jan 25, 2011 14:16:09 GMT -5 mhall77 said:

Thank you for that great analogy Susan. It cleared up a lot of questions in my mind also. I too have been working with the Scio for the past several years and it is hard to break a pattern even when you know it is not necessary. It's like "the need to know" which is better if you don't know. Now we have the SRC and the game is "keep it simple". Aren't we fortunate to know David and Ray and to be the small percentage of the world to have this program. I guess you could call us the "chosen". Now we need to help pass this on.
Many Blessings, Marlene

My pleasure, as I also learn from my on answers. ;D
xo
s

[constance]

Thank you Susan...I so appreciate you for helping!
Blessings to ya~Constance~

[quantumg]

And another Thank You to you, Susan! Brilliant answer from someone who has a a lot of knowledge for us all! G.